Please use categories (on WordPress) and/or tags (on WordPress and on Substack, labels on Blogger/Blogspot) when writing your blog posts. Use categories to indicate the author (Proust, Arlt, Piglia…), and tags for key concepts or topics covered (gender, postmodernism, truth…), or labels for both purposes on Blogger.
Remember also to include a question for discussion.
Check out the Blog Post Awards 2026 or the Blog Post Awards 2024 for further inspiration.
Week Six: Françoise Sagan, Bonjour Tristesse
Posted by: feedwordpress
This week, the book I read was Bonjour Tristesse. I have to say, out of all the books that I have read thus far in this class, this was one of the ones I enjoyed the most. It was a very easy, fun story to read and I believe that had something to do with the relatability of the main character’s age and personality. I honestly truly enjoyed reading Cécile as a character. She is a naive, young, negligent and intense girl. As she made her plans and plotted against Anne and her father, it seemed as if she was pretty careless with her actions. She kept changing her mind on whether or not she wanted to continue carrying out her plan, and because of her indecisiveness, she kind of neglected the consequences that resulted from her actions. She would leave Cyril and Elsa in the dark by not giving them an update on the plan for days if she felt like it and just used them as chess pieces in her game. She seems to represent the very essence of a seventeen year old girl who has been spoiled with the comfort of knowing that she will never be in need of anything and that everything will work itself out in the end. The fact that the author was also 18 when she wrote this story is probably why Cécile’s character feels so real. It was very easy to understand the way she thought about life and to sympathize with her because she was so honest.
There’s something bubble-like about the way she lives her life. She is quite sheltered from the struggles of the outside world thanks to her father, his money and his status. She doesn’t have to fend for herself in terms of making a living or even going to school. I almost want to protect her little bubble forever because it feels so worry-free and quaint. However, there’s also a sense of danger that comes with this type of carelessness. It allows her to justify meddling and playing around with other people and their lives, like she did with Anne and the relationship she had with Cécile’s father. While she’s not obviously completely responsible for what happened to Anne, there’s something of a warning in there about cause and effect, and being prudent about the consequences that can arise as a result of playing God.
Here is my question this week: How much responsibility should Cécile feel about Anne’s accident, if any?
Bonjour Tristesse by Françoise Sagan Blog Post.
Posted by: feedwordpress
Bonjour Tristesse- reflections
Posted by: feedwordpress
Black Shack Alley
Posted by: feedwordpress
Bonjour Tristesse
Posted by: feedwordpress
Bonjour Tristesse was one of the books I have been looking forward to this entire course, just based off of the short description given, and it did not disappoint. I found this book to be one of the easier, or more liner books we have read so far. Not that the others haven't been interesting in their own ways but this one definitely held my attention the whole way through and it was very enjoyable to follow along.
I think that one of the main reasons I loved it so much was actually because I was able to see so many parallels between the relationship Cecile and Raymond had and Agostino and his mother had. The situations were so similar yet different dynamics so it was interesting to read both of these novels one after the other.
Another thing I really enjoyed was the relatability of this book, not necessarily content wise just based off of my own life ( I was not raised by a single parent etc. ) but in terms of approximate age, gender and the fact that it almost felt like this was written as a diary. Ceciles character was fascinating to read about although I did find her actions to be very destructive ( as she feels at the end of the novel ) and definitely don't agree with some of the feelings she has and the way she handled them. As with Agostino, Cecile being jealous of the women in her fathers life may come across as strange but I believe a part of this book is to show how normal these feelings may be.
I think that (not to the extreme of the book) the situation of trying to prevent a parents marriage is something that happens more often than we think (the plan might not work realistically, but definitely the feelings of wanting to or at least a plan itself). In this extreme case, Cecile just wanting his father to be with someone she did not feel threatened by (like Elsa) and she almost admires Anne that makes her jealous because she is taking all of her fathers time and she in a way wishes to be as put together as Anne. This is very similar to the situation in Agostino.
My questions for this novel would be, do you think the way Cecile was raised by her father is what brought her to have this love/hatred for a woman like Anne? Do you think Cecile possesses a sort of privilege because of the way she was raised?
read full post >>Bonjour Tristesse
Posted by: feedwordpress
Bonjour Tristesse was one of the books I have been looking forward to this entire course, just based off of the short description given, and it did not disappoint. I found this book to be one of the easier, or more liner books we have read so far. Not that the others haven't been interesting in their own ways but this one definitely held my attention the whole way through and it was very enjoyable to follow along.
I think that one of the main reasons I loved it so much was actually because I was able to see so many parallels between the relationship Cecile and Raymond had and Agostino and his mother had. The situations were so similar yet different dynamics so it was interesting to read both of these novels one after the other.
Another thing I really enjoyed was the relatability of this book, not necessarily content wise just based off of my own life ( I was not raised by a single parent etc. ) but in terms of approximate age, gender and the fact that it almost felt like this was written as a diary. Ceciles character was fascinating to read about although I did find her actions to be very destructive ( as she feels at the end of the novel ) and definitely don't agree with some of the feelings she has and the way she handled them. As with Agostino, Cecile being jealous of the women in her fathers life may come across as strange but I believe a part of this book is to show how normal these feelings may be.
I think that (not to the extreme of the book) the situation of trying to prevent a parents marriage is something that happens more often than we think (the plan might not work realistically, but definitely the feelings of wanting to or at least a plan itself). In this extreme case, Cecile just wanting his father to be with someone she did not feel threatened by (like Elsa) and she almost admires Anne that makes her jealous because she is taking all of her fathers time and she in a way wishes to be as put together as Anne. This is very similar to the situation in Agostino.
My questions for this novel would be, do you think the way Cecile was raised by her father is what brought her to have this love/hatred for a woman like Anne? Do you think Cecile possesses a sort of privilege because of the way she was raised?
read full post >>Bonjour Tristesse by Françoise Sagan
Posted by: feedwordpress
“Bonjour Tristesse” by Françoise Sagan
Posted by: feedwordpress
Zobel’s Black Shack Alley Thoughts
Posted by: feedwordpress
Sagan’s Bonjour Tristesse
Posted by: feedwordpress
“Bonjour Tristesse” by Francoise Sagan
Posted by: feedwordpress
Week 6: Sagan’s “Bonjour Tristesse”
Posted by: feedwordpress
Bonjour Tristesse
Posted by: feedwordpress
Thoughts on Sagan’s “Bonjour Tristesse”
Posted by: feedwordpress
Bonjour Tristesse by Sagan
Posted by: feedwordpress
I think Cecile would have benefited greatly from the positive influence Anne brought with her. It was hard to see her destroy Anne and her father’s relationship especially once she began to bond with Anne. The environment Céline was raised in blinded her to what Anne’s intentions were, even after the time they spent together after her mother’s death and how “embarrassingly fond of her” (7) she was. Her actions came from fear and selfishness to keep her way of life from changing. Without giving praise to the main character I will say I found her scheming and frivolous lifestyle to be quite entertaining. On page 18, Cécile declared that she tried to base her life on Oscar Wilde’s quote “Sin is the only note of vivid colour that persists in the modern world” and Anne came in as a representation of everything Cécile hated. With the best intentions, Anne wanted to marry her father, but Cécile’s lifestyle and fundamental identity were immediately threatened. First with Anne’s involvement in her studies and then her interference in Cécile’s relationship with Cyril. I thought after the conversation Anne and Cécile had about the future on pages 104-5 along with some other bonding moments between the two, Cécile would put an end to her plans. Even though it was in her nature, I was disappointed that Cécile could not grow from the idea of how she was supposed to live and make room for Anne and her preparations for the future.
Overall I like how this reading depicted Cécie and her father’s inability and unwillingness to change. The ending was sad, but it left me wondering if the three of them would work as a family or if Cécile would continue to find new ways to get rid of Anne? Cécile was heartbroken losing Anne, but if she never felt the loss, she would have probably never fully realized the consequences of her actions.
My question for the class is Would Cécile be better adjusted to cope with the changes Anne brought to her life if her father raised her to be more disciplined?
