Aragon’s Paris Peasant For this week I decided to first see the lecture video before reading the book and when I heard that it was about surrealism I got excited as I know a few things about André Bréton although I have never read a book written by him. But most importantly I got excited […]
Aragon, Ocean and Kerouac
As I read Paris Peasant, and delved deeper into the surrealist movement and its dealings with the unconscious state, my first thought was of Frank Ocean. In Paris Peasant, and surrealist works in general, images are strung together to create a surrealist and unconscious landscape from which to gain insight. Similarly to Ocean, his prose is almost a stream-of-consciousness rambling, making quick jumps and sharp imagery to dance around a scene without quite narrating it. Instead, they both focus on digging and searching for the essence of the experience which is being described. Metaphors and surreal imagery are used to cast a haunting tone to the novel, and these small issues of tone and word choice are key in order to develop a theme and experience for the reader.
I took the liberty of rearranging a particularly interesting quotation into a poetic format, to illustrate the melody and “dance” of Aragon’s translated prose.
Best of all
love thrusts up shoots where no one plants it :
how vulgarity convulses it !
it is liable
to give
sudden wanton twitches
There are maniacs possessed
by the street’s haunting memory
and only there
can they experience
the full flow
of their nature
Another artist who comes to mind is Jack Kerouac. While writing 40+ years later, he used imagery, setting and experience to flesh out ideas and insights in a similarly surreal and consciousness inspired way.
Here is a snapshot of Kerouac’s writing, again transposed to be framed as a poem.
I realized
these were all
the snapshots which our children would look at
someday with wonder
thinking their parents had lived smooth, well-ordered lives
and got up in the morning to walk proudly on the sidewalks of life
never dreaming
the raggedy madness
and riot of our actual lives,
our actual night,
the hell of it,
the senseless emptiness.
The two passages are similar in tone, and the insights they seek are similar in terms of existentialism and the human experience. Interestingly both authors are also French-speakers, though Kerouac’s work is not translated.
Questions
Are there any authors or artists who’s work Louis Aragon work makes you think of?
Has surrealism had an impact on current artists or authors you enjoy?
Aragon, Ocean and Kerouac
As I read Paris Peasant, and delved deeper into the surrealist movement and its dealings with the unconscious state, my first thought was of Frank Ocean. In Paris Peasant, and surrealist works in general, images are strung together to create a surrealist and unconscious landscape from which to gain insight. Similarly to Ocean, his prose is almost a stream-of-consciousness rambling, making quick jumps and sharp imagery to dance around a scene without quite narrating it. Instead, they both focus on digging and searching for the essence of the experience which is being described. Metaphors and surreal imagery are used to cast a haunting tone to the novel, and these small issues of tone and word choice are key in order to develop a theme and experience for the reader.
I took the liberty of rearranging a particularly interesting quotation into a poetic format, to illustrate the melody and “dance” of Aragon’s translated prose.
Best of all
love thrusts up shoots where no one plants it :
how vulgarity convulses it !
it is liable
to give
sudden wanton twitches
There are maniacs possessed
by the street’s haunting memory
and only there
can they experience
the full flow
of their nature
Another artist who comes to mind is Jack Kerouac. While writing 40+ years later, he used imagery, setting and experience to flesh out ideas and insights in a similarly surreal and consciousness inspired way.
Here is a snapshot of Kerouac’s writing, again transposed to be framed as a poem.
I realized
these were all
the snapshots which our children would look at
someday with wonder
thinking their parents had lived smooth, well-ordered lives
and got up in the morning to walk proudly on the sidewalks of life
never dreaming
the raggedy madness
and riot of our actual lives,
our actual night,
the hell of it,
the senseless emptiness.
The two passages are similar in tone, and the insights they seek are similar in terms of existentialism and the human experience. Interestingly both authors are also French-speakers, though Kerouac’s work is not translated.
Questions
Are there any authors or artists who’s work Louis Aragon work makes you think of?
Has surrealism had an impact on current artists or authors you enjoy?
I’ll be honest, when I first cracked open this book, I did not expect the start it presented me with. Perhaps I should have known from years of experience not to expect the book to immediately explain the title the author has given it however, this may be the first book that really drove home […]
Hello everyone! In this week’s post, I’m going to be reflecting on my reading of Louis Aragon’s Paris Peasant. I’ve…
Posted in Aragon, Blogs | Tagged with understadning
For this week’s readings, Paris Peasant by Louis Aragon, I found myself at the start a bit confused because I first approached this novel with an annalistic point of view. I caught myself trying to analyze every detail to discover more about the narrative, plot, back story etc. However, as I read more and watched the introduction video about the novel, I became aware of Argon’s intention that it was a “kind of novel that would break all traditional rules governing fiction, one that would be neither a narrative nor a character study.” So, I had to re-read the pages to take in the book in the way it was meant to.
The imagery and detail throughout this novel painted a clear picture of the different areas of Paris. This book captured his day-to-day doings. Personally, I am a very observant person myself, especially when walking around campus or anywhere else. I pay close attention to the environment and the people in it. I enjoyed being a part of the narrator’s thoughts and scenarios as he walked around about the architecture and the people he passed by. I found the passage about women very interesting. It explains women with great detail and resembles them as flashes of light. He explains, “after passing an infinity of these desirable shimmering, without having attempted to take possessions of a single one of these lives… I ask myself disgustedly what I’m doing in the world” (8). I picture the narrator being caught up in his unconscious mind. I thought that the change in the narrator’s environment and the increase of modernization was a cause of stress for him. Also, the fact that he is constantly thinking about the philosophy of his surroundings could be to compensate for his quiet behaviour and his anxiety around his changing community that is making him question his life choices.
This book is known for surrealism. I was not aware of surrealism until reading this book. I searched up surrealism because I wanted to understand the story more. Argon did a fantastic job projecting surrealism and allowing the narrative to focus and allow the unconscious mind to express itself. I enjoyed following him along throughout Paris and understanding his interpretations of the cafe menu, monuments, newspaper clipping, and the people of Paris. The narrator was so detailed it was like being in the thoughts of someone’s mind. My question for this reading is How do you think the narrator felt about the increase in modernization? Overall, this story was nothing close to what I have ever read and it gave me an open mind to surrealism.
For this week’s readings, Paris Peasant by Louis Aragon, I found myself at the start a bit confused because I first approached this novel with an annalistic point of view. I caught myself trying to analyze every detail to discover more about the narrative, plot, back story etc. However, as I read more and watched the introduction video about the novel, I became aware of Argon’s intention that it was a “kind of novel that would break all traditional rules governing fiction, one that would be neither a narrative nor a character study.” So, I had to re-read the pages to take in the book in the way it was meant to.
The imagery and detail throughout this novel painted a clear picture of the different areas of Paris. This book captured his day-to-day doings. Personally, I am a very observant person myself, especially when walking around campus or anywhere else. I pay close attention to the environment and the people in it. I enjoyed being a part of the narrator’s thoughts and scenarios as he walked around about the architecture and the people he passed by. I found the passage about women very interesting. It explains women with great detail and resembles them as flashes of light. He explains, “after passing an infinity of these desirable shimmering, without having attempted to take possessions of a single one of these lives… I ask myself disgustedly what I’m doing in the world” (8). I picture the narrator being caught up in his unconscious mind. I thought that the change in the narrator’s environment and the increase of modernization was a cause of stress for him. Also, the fact that he is constantly thinking about the philosophy of his surroundings could be to compensate for his quiet behaviour and his anxiety around his changing community that is making him question his life choices.
This book is known for surrealism. I was not aware of surrealism until reading this book. I searched up surrealism because I wanted to understand the story more. Argon did a fantastic job projecting surrealism and allowing the narrative to focus and allow the unconscious mind to express itself. I enjoyed following him along throughout Paris and understanding his interpretations of the cafe menu, monuments, newspaper clipping, and the people of Paris. The narrator was so detailed it was like being in the thoughts of someone’s mind. My question for this reading is How do you think the narrator felt about the increase in modernization? Overall, this story was nothing close to what I have ever read and it gave me an open mind to surrealism.
I’d like to start this off by first giving attention to the details. The amount of imagery put into this novel was incredible. The narrator painted an authentic picture of the Passage de l’Opéra and the Buttes-Chaumont. I have never read anything quite like this where I was so vividly transported into the scenes. It takes the reader and places them directly into the eyes and thoughts of the narrator. One thing that I found really added to the novel was the incorporation of different menus, signs, and newspaper clippings, the visual element gave more dimensions to the story that made the reader feel as if they were there too. As well as the visual elements I thought it was cool that Aragon incorporated a playlet on page 74 and a fable on page 68 to add new elements.
The narrator is constantly analyzing their surroundings and putting intellectual reasoning behind everything he sees. So I found it amusing on page 101 when he says “I would have never thought of myself as an observer,” contradicting the whole novel. Not only did the detail transport us to the setting, but through the narrator’s inner monologue we were given a chance to immerse ourselves into the setting and what it was like to walk through an arcade at this time. I like the fact that the narrator was just wandering aimlessly around without purpose because you never get to see from that perspective. With nothing to do except walk around and observe, and the fact that it is the narrator’s domain, everything feels more genuine. I think everyone is usually so busy and with purpose in both reality and in fiction and the author was able to give us an outlook that we do not usually see.
I found it hard to follow along with this text as it didn’t follow any of the traditional makings of a story. I found it confusing and I think reading it a few more times would help me make sense of it. I have no background knowledge on surrealism in literature, but I thought that Paris Peasant was a good place to start. This was a new point of view that I have never come across before. However, I also think a lot of the context went over my head. My Question for this post is: What did you think of this perspective? Did it give you insight and provoke thought or did you find it difficult to make sense of?
I’d like to start this off by first giving attention to the details. The amount of imagery put into this novel was incredible. The narrator painted an authentic picture of the Passage de l’Opéra and the Buttes-Chaumont. I have never read anything quite like this where I was so vividly transported into the scenes. It takes the reader and places them directly into the eyes and thoughts of the narrator. One thing that I found really added to the novel was the incorporation of different menus, signs, and newspaper clippings, the visual element gave more dimensions to the story that made the reader feel as if they were there too. As well as the visual elements I thought it was cool that Aragon incorporated a playlet on page 74 and a fable on page 68 to add new elements.
The narrator is constantly analyzing their surroundings and putting intellectual reasoning behind everything he sees. So I found it amusing on page 101 when he says “I would have never thought of myself as an observer,” contradicting the whole novel. Not only did the detail transport us to the setting, but through the narrator’s inner monologue we were given a chance to immerse ourselves into the setting and what it was like to walk through an arcade at this time. I like the fact that the narrator was just wandering aimlessly around without purpose because you never get to see from that perspective. With nothing to do except walk around and observe, and the fact that it is the narrator’s domain, everything feels more genuine. I think everyone is usually so busy and with purpose in both reality and in fiction and the author was able to give us an outlook that we do not usually see.
I found it hard to follow along with this text as it didn’t follow any of the traditional makings of a story. I found it confusing and I think reading it a few more times would help me make sense of it. I have no background knowledge on surrealism in literature, but I thought that Paris Peasant was a good place to start. This was a new point of view that I have never come across before. However, I also think a lot of the context went over my head. My Question for this post is: What did you think of this perspective? Did it give you insight and provoke thought or did you find it difficult to make sense of?
From the degree of the angle to which a building is adjacent from another, to the palpable explanations of otherwise mundane objects, like a chair, Aragon’s words draw the reader in as imagination blends with description. I had never read a book quite like this before. With little plot, but extensive descriptions mixed with existential […]
