Blogs

This weeks reading originally was very hard for me to follow, and I found I actually had to restart twice to be able to form the proper differentiation between the two narratives. However, once I grasped the back and forth I found Perec’s work very enjoyable and insightful. It got me thinking a lot about […] read full post >>

With two narratives being told in alternating chapters, I felt a bit lost at times while reading Georges Perec’s W, or the Memory of Childhood. I personally found that the switches between the fictional story of W and Perec’s memoir sections to be a bit disruptive and made it difficult to maintaining the flow of reading. There […] read full post >>

This week while reading “W or The Memory of Childhood” by Georges Perec, I felt as if I was reading someone’s personal diary mixed with some odd dark version of the Olympics. I found it a bit difficult to follow the two narratives (especially with the copious amount of footnotes) but as the book went … Continue reading "Thoughts on Perec’s W or The Memory of Childhood" read full post >>

W, or the Memory of Childhood is kind of a confusing book that is open for many interpretations. The fact that it was a story written with different narratives and storylines was something I had not read that often, which was kind of interesting. I can absolutely see the postmodern influence of Perec’s writing all […] read full post >>

This week’s reading of W or The Memory of Childhood was reflective and insightful about the author's experience. At the start of the book, I was confused for a while about the significance of the second story about Gaspard Winkler, but as the story of W progressed I was able to start comparing it to Perec’s experience.  I loved the style the author wrote this novel in. The autobiography paired with the fictional island of W gave the text different elements that provide the reader more to think about. 

The narration from Perec’s perspective showed fragments of his childhood memories. He lost both of his parents to World War II at a very young age. I think the trauma caused him to repress his memories as he was often not sure about all the specifics in his own memories. A lot of the language in this narrative was hesitant, words like vague, hazy, and many I don’t remember or I don’t recall. The author says it himself on page 68, “What marks this period especially is the absence of landmarks: these memories are scraps of life snatched from the void. No mooring. Nothing to anchor them or hold them down. Almost no way of ratifying them. No sequence in time, except as I have reconstructed it arbitrarily  over the years.”

In the second narrative the army deserter, Gaspard Winckler journeys to the island W, where a brutal version of the Olympic games takes place. This story combined with Perec’s life story highlights the fight for survival so many people, Perec included had to face. The brutality and cruelty in these games, I think, are somewhat of a metaphor for the concentration camps and the treatment of the Jewish people along with the other prisoners held by the Nazis. While reading about the W it seems impossible or only fiction for a society to function as this one does. I was slow to understand why it was even in this book, but from the middle, towards the end, it became clear that W was referencing power relations and the extent of oppression groups of people can be shown by other groups. On the last page, the excerpt from David Rousset’s Univers concentrationnaire we see that the harsh reality Perec illustrates in the fictional W is taken directly from real events. 

My question for the class is: How does comparing the conditions faced in WW2 to W help Perec or the reader process these events?

read full post >>

This week’s reading of W or The Memory of Childhood was reflective and insightful about the author's experience. At the start of the book, I was confused for a while about the significance of the second story about Gaspard Winkler, but as the story of W progressed I was able to start comparing it to Perec’s experience.  I loved the style the author wrote this novel in. The autobiography paired with the fictional island of W gave the text different elements that provide the reader more to think about. 

The narration from Perec’s perspective showed fragments of his childhood memories. He lost both of his parents to World War II at a very young age. I think the trauma caused him to repress his memories as he was often not sure about all the specifics in his own memories. A lot of the language in this narrative was hesitant, words like vague, hazy, and many I don’t remember or I don’t recall. The author says it himself on page 68, “What marks this period especially is the absence of landmarks: these memories are scraps of life snatched from the void. No mooring. Nothing to anchor them or hold them down. Almost no way of ratifying them. No sequence in time, except as I have reconstructed it arbitrarily  over the years.”

In the second narrative the army deserter, Gaspard Winckler journeys to the island W, where a brutal version of the Olympic games takes place. This story combined with Perec’s life story highlights the fight for survival so many people, Perec included had to face. The brutality and cruelty in these games, I think, are somewhat of a metaphor for the concentration camps and the treatment of the Jewish people along with the other prisoners held by the Nazis. While reading about the W it seems impossible or only fiction for a society to function as this one does. I was slow to understand why it was even in this book, but from the middle, towards the end, it became clear that W was referencing power relations and the extent of oppression groups of people can be shown by other groups. On the last page, the excerpt from David Rousset’s Univers concentrationnaire we see that the harsh reality Perec illustrates in the fictional W is taken directly from real events. 

My question for the class is: How does comparing the conditions faced in WW2 to W help Perec or the reader process these events?

read full post >>

This week, I read Georges Perec, W, or the Memory of Childhood a story about two characters, alternating between chapters. I found this style of narrative interesting because we can better compare the two. I expected the book to be confusing with two narratives, but Perec did a great job of making it clear and easy to read. While reading the second narrative of Gaspard Winkler, I sensed that some of the conditions being told had an underlying meaning that related to the first narrative of Perec. It was clear both the characters are going through their separate journeys but share a lot in common by witnessing similar conditions.  

It was sad to read about the narrator trying so hard to remember his childhood memories. I felt a strong sense of displacement that the narrator was feeling from the impacts of the war. With the narrator being born in 1936, he spent many of his developmental years in the fear that being impacted by the second World War brings. Living in those circumstances and growing up in that environment has left him shattered as he tries to pick up the pieces and form memories from vague moments and photographs. This story could be one of many children at that time losing their parents, living in fear, and being too young to even understand why. 

In the book, the narrator takes us to the island W where a similar competition like the Olympics takes place. This island W reflects the Nazi’s organized death camps. In the narrator’s interpretation of this island W, the competitors who win get awarded with food, the competitors who lose get nothing and starve, making them weaker. This creates a continuous cycle of the strong getting stronger and the weak getting weaker. It is a game of luck and misconduct that reflects the treatment of those suffering at the hands of the Nazi takeover. 

I was unaware and found it shocking that the summer Olympics were hosted in Berlin in 1936, known as the Nazi Olympics. I was shocked when I searched it up and found out that such a huge event like the Olympics was held during these horrific times, especially in Germany. For this to occur, it showed such a lack of humanity and no recognition of the injustices.

My question for the class is: How do the two narratives compare regarding the two men witnessing and being a part of injustice in their environment?

read full post >>

This week, I read Georges Perec, W, or the Memory of Childhood a story about two characters, alternating between chapters. I found this style of narrative interesting because we can better compare the two. I expected the book to be confusing with two narratives, but Perec did a great job of making it clear and easy to read. While reading the second narrative of Gaspard Winkler, I sensed that some of the conditions being told had an underlying meaning that related to the first narrative of Perec. It was clear both the characters are going through their separate journeys but share a lot in common by witnessing similar conditions.  

It was sad to read about the narrator trying so hard to remember his childhood memories. I felt a strong sense of displacement that the narrator was feeling from the impacts of the war. With the narrator being born in 1936, he spent many of his developmental years in the fear that being impacted by the second World War brings. Living in those circumstances and growing up in that environment has left him shattered as he tries to pick up the pieces and form memories from vague moments and photographs. This story could be one of many children at that time losing their parents, living in fear, and being too young to even understand why. 

In the book, the narrator takes us to the island W where a similar competition like the Olympics takes place. This island W reflects the Nazi’s organized death camps. In the narrator’s interpretation of this island W, the competitors who win get awarded with food, the competitors who lose get nothing and starve, making them weaker. This creates a continuous cycle of the strong getting stronger and the weak getting weaker. It is a game of luck and misconduct that reflects the treatment of those suffering at the hands of the Nazi takeover. 

I was unaware and found it shocking that the summer Olympics were hosted in Berlin in 1936, known as the Nazi Olympics. I was shocked when I searched it up and found out that such a huge event like the Olympics was held during these horrific times, especially in Germany. For this to occur, it showed such a lack of humanity and no recognition of the injustices.

My question for the class is: How do the two narratives compare regarding the two men witnessing and being a part of injustice in their environment?

read full post >>

This week, I read ‘W, or the memory of childhood’ by Perec Georges.

I was confused at first. In part one, the narrator mentioned how his father died when he was 6 and got adopted by his father’s neighbours. However, in part two his father died when he was 4 and was adopted by his father’s sister and her husband. Then I re-read it and found out that they have mentioned this story will be alternating between two texts. The narrator switched from one story to another. I found this kind of transition distracting as I couldn't figure if the texts had switched to the other or not. However, it got better as the story progressed because I realized that we are able to tell the story has been switched by the font. One text is in Italic font and the other is not. 

Despite the narrator mentioning how he has no memories of his childhood, he kept trying to recall the memories of when he was a kid. His parents passed away when he was young and he barely has any memories with them, yet he still talks about them. On page 12, he mentioned “like everyone else, or almost everyone, I had a father and a mother, a potty, a cat, a rattle, and, later on, a bicycle…Like everyone else, I have forgotten everything about the earliest years of my existence”. I found that texts give off the feelings of loneliness. He may just be expressing that he is like others and has what everyone needs at first. To me, it feels more like he has lost his sense of identity and is sarcastic at the fact that he ‘started’ just like ‘everyone else’. I feel sorry for him as it seems to me that he is trying to connect himself to his parents by the memories of others and the stuff he possesses (ex: photograph of his parents). As the narrator does not have many memories with them, most of the information he knows about them is being told by others (his aunts). He even saved up the money his aunt had given him for the bus just to buy a soldier toy. I believe the reason he got it is due to his father. He wanted to feel more connected to him. 

The question I have for the class is: Do you think one is able to find a sense of belonging from their memories?

read full post >>

This week, I read ‘W, or the memory of childhood’ by Perec Georges.

I was confused at first. In part one, the narrator mentioned how his father died when he was 6 and got adopted by his father’s neighbours. However, in part two his father died when he was 4 and was adopted by his father’s sister and her husband. Then I re-read it and found out that they have mentioned this story will be alternating between two texts. The narrator switched from one story to another. I found this kind of transition distracting as I couldn't figure if the texts had switched to the other or not. However, it got better as the story progressed because I realized that we are able to tell the story has been switched by the font. One text is in Italic font and the other is not. 

Despite the narrator mentioning how he has no memories of his childhood, he kept trying to recall the memories of when he was a kid. His parents passed away when he was young and he barely has any memories with them, yet he still talks about them. On page 12, he mentioned “like everyone else, or almost everyone, I had a father and a mother, a potty, a cat, a rattle, and, later on, a bicycle…Like everyone else, I have forgotten everything about the earliest years of my existence”. I found that texts give off the feelings of loneliness. He may just be expressing that he is like others and has what everyone needs at first. To me, it feels more like he has lost his sense of identity and is sarcastic at the fact that he ‘started’ just like ‘everyone else’. I feel sorry for him as it seems to me that he is trying to connect himself to his parents by the memories of others and the stuff he possesses (ex: photograph of his parents). As the narrator does not have many memories with them, most of the information he knows about them is being told by others (his aunts). He even saved up the money his aunt had given him for the bus just to buy a soldier toy. I believe the reason he got it is due to his father. He wanted to feel more connected to him. 

The question I have for the class is: Do you think one is able to find a sense of belonging from their memories?

read full post >>